Congressman Peter Visclosky spoke to students and faculty about his views on a variety of topics including the bailout, the cur­rent United States energy situation and health care at Valparaiso University School of Law on October 22, 2008.

Visclosky, a native of Northwest Indiana, is the Congressional Represen­tative for the first District of Indiana, which is comprised of Porter, Lake, Jas­per, Newton and Benton counties. He is also the chair of the House of Represen­tatives’ Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development.

In addressing the recent bailout package passed by Congress, Visclosky said he, “took great umbrage as an ac­counting major,” with the total amount of the bailout and the short time frame in which it passed. He said he felt that alternatives should have been explored, and that liquidity issues and market stability should have been addressed as well as possible changes to current bankruptcy laws. Visclosky also said that current executive compensation needs to be dealt with as some corporate executives, “are being paid 250 times what the average U.S. worker makes.”

As to other possible ap­proaches, Visclosky said that when Sweden faced a similar financial crisis, the government took control of assets. “We should have considered what they did,” said Visclosky instead of a, “no strings attached” bailout.

In discussing what the gov­ernment is considering in addition to the bailout, Visclosky said that Treasury Secretary, Henry Paul­son, “is moving towards dealing with the liquidity issues of the financial crisis.” He also stated that there is a strong movement afoot in Congress to do another stimulus package, with proposed figures ranging from 61 billion to 300 billion dollars.

Visclosky also noted that problems with the future market were raised in the late 1990’s while President Clinton was in office, but the Clinton administra­tion passed up the proverbial first bite of the apple.

Regarding the current U.S. energy situation, Visclosky said that he would like the U.S. to, “move to a carbon free econo­my.” As chair of the Energy and Water Development subcommit­tee, Visclosky has been looking into renewable sources of energy for the past few years and he believes that the energy problem is one that can be solved.

Visclosky said that you have to throw money at the prob­lem, but also spend it as wisely as possible. For example, “I can’t promise to do anything to lower the price of gas, but I can do some­thing to get better gas mileage in vehicles,” said Visclosky. He also stated that there is more coal in Indiana and Illinois than in all of Saudi Arabia, and that research is ongo­ing to determine if coal can be used in an environmentally sound way.

In researching other possible solu­tions to the energy is­sue, Visclosky said that part of the research they are looking to do is on building technol­ogy – “how do you build buildings that are energy efficient and do not need outside energy to run” their systems. Other areas in which energy research is be­ing performed include solar and geothermal energy as well as wave and tidal action. Visclosky said that there is some thought that the At­lantic and Pacific coasts could provide vast amounts of energy for the U.S.

Regarding health care, Visclosky said, “the system is not working for people’s health currently.” He also stated that over the last two years, 89 million Americans under the age of 65 found themselves without health care at some point. “That’s wrong in this country; it’s the wrong social and eco­nomic policy,” said Visclosky. We need to find a, ”much more efficient system to provide health care,” and we also need to draw the line as to how we’re going to have medicine provided, said Visclosky. “People come here from all over the world to seek treatment at cer­tain institutions or from certain people, but quality is not universal” in our cur­rent health care system, said Visclosky.

Visclosky also briefly talked about the war in Iraq and improving the cur­rent infrastructure, but said that specific policies regarding these issues depend on the outcome of the presidential elec­tion in November.

Visclosky is also in favor of ex­tending the South Shore train service to Valparaiso and Lowell, Indiana to promote new economic growth in those communities and not just provide trans­portation to Chicago.

Rachel is a 3L and can be reached at Rachel.Sharron@valpo.edu

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment. Login »